Reason #2,346 Why Hume Is More Awesome Than You Think
Gender constructivism in the year 1740 AD.Note that Hume doesn’t suggest gender construction as some radical alternative; he notes explicitly that he takes it for granted that gender is constructed.  
Judy?  Judy who?

Reason #2,346 Why Hume Is More Awesome Than You Think

Gender constructivism in the year 1740 AD.
Note that Hume doesn’t suggest gender construction as some radical alternative; he notes explicitly that he takes it for granted that gender is constructed. 

Judy?  Judy who?

  1. quietistdreamscapes reblogged this from fucktheory
  2. dialectickle reblogged this from fucktheory
  3. ogdoad reblogged this from jackdanielswife
  4. fluffybullet reblogged this from fucktheory
  5. thetimesinbetween reblogged this from fucktheory
  6. retorsion reblogged this from fucktheory
  7. unweariedheavens reblogged this from fucktheory
  8. onceuponatop reblogged this from fucktheory
  9. marquisdesad reblogged this from notalexus and added:
    Tattooing this on my body. (Not really.) (But maybe?) (Helen?)
  10. reliablememory reblogged this from fucktheory and added:
    fucktheory Reason #2,346 Why Hume Is More Awesome Than You Think Gender constructivism in the year 1740 AD. Note that...
  11. rrrrohini reblogged this from fucktheory
  12. emanners reblogged this from fucktheory
  13. notalexus reblogged this from fucktheory
  14. jackdanielswife reblogged this from fucktheory
  15. littleopticalmachine reblogged this from fucktheory and added:
    inneresting.